
Showing posts with label Ayn Rand. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ayn Rand. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
New poster.
Labels:
A is A,
Ayn Rand,
Objectivism philosophy
Monday, December 15, 2008
Atlas Barked And Wants His Belly Rubbed.
Research finds that a dog will no longer do a trick if another dog is rewarded and he is not.
Article: Dogs will go on strike over unfair treats.
If I had been the researcher, I would have named one dog "Taxpayer" and the other "Welfare Recipient."
Barney Frank will no doubt totally ignore this study.
Article: Dogs will go on strike over unfair treats.
To see if dogs have a sense when pay for work is fair, a kneeling
researcher asks for a paw to shake ... If that dog doesn't get treats for
repeated handshakes, but sees one of its pals rewarded with a bit of bread or
sausage ..., the unrewarded animal eventually goes on strike, refusing to shake
hands any more.
If I had been the researcher, I would have named one dog "Taxpayer" and the other "Welfare Recipient."
Barney Frank will no doubt totally ignore this study.
Labels:
Atlas Shrugged,
Ayn Rand,
Barney Frank,
liberalism,
progressive taxation,
welfare
Monday, March 17, 2008
Don't hold your breath.
Caroline Baum of Bloomberg News suggests a John Galt Plan to fix the economy.
The purpose of the U.S. government since and including the New Deal isn't to protect people's rights, Caroline. It isn't even to ease every burden, as the Left would have you believe.
The purpose of post-Depression government in the United States is to grow the government.
And the people wouldn't stand for that if all the problems were solved.
So the problems won't get solved. The government will continue to cause problems and claim it's solving them, so the poor and uneducated will continue to believe they're being "rescued."
Today's economic and financial crisis would resolve itself more quickly and efficiently if the government got out [the hell] of the way.But her own closing remarks demonstrate why it won't happen.
The bigger the mess, the more urgent the calls for a government solution, the more willing government is to oblige.
The purpose of the U.S. government since and including the New Deal isn't to protect people's rights, Caroline. It isn't even to ease every burden, as the Left would have you believe.
The purpose of post-Depression government in the United States is to grow the government.
And the people wouldn't stand for that if all the problems were solved.
So the problems won't get solved. The government will continue to cause problems and claim it's solving them, so the poor and uneducated will continue to believe they're being "rescued."
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
The next time you need a B, another B, or a T . . .
... make sure you get it from BB&T.
Because they are Randian Superheroes that do things that are actually, well, Randian.
A snippet from the press release:
And here you thought BB&T stood for "Bed, Bath, and Towel."
Because they are Randian Superheroes that do things that are actually, well, Randian.
A snippet from the press release:
BB&T West Virginia Group/State President Phyllis Arnold said a key component of the BB&T Center will be to provide students with a solid grounding in the workings of capitalism and free market forces. Components of the Center’s curriculum include but are not limited to:An upper level course focusing on the principles set forth in Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged and Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations.“There is overwhelming evidence that capitalism produces a higher economic standard of living,” said Arnold. “John Allison, our chairman and chief executive officer, passionately believes there needs to be a deeper understanding of the moral defense of capitalism and its causal relationship to economic well being.”
A Lecture series known as the BB&T Lectures with speakers advocating public policies that promote economic and political freedom.
And here you thought BB&T stood for "Bed, Bath, and Towel."
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
McCain: If I have to explain it, you wouldn't understand.
I'd have to dig out my old copies of Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology or maybe Philosophy, Who Needs It to verify this, but I'm pretty sure that argument would make Ayn Rand vomit.
It smacks of the "Everybody knows..." argument and the "It's a proven fact ..." argument. What shall we call it, the "If you question it, you don't understand" argument?
[H/T 2 M-Yg.]
Labels:
Ayn Rand,
John McCain,
Objectivism philosophy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)